Previous Entry Share Next Entry
(no subject)
2012
unknownj
Utterly ridiculous..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6978272.stm

This is such poor writing:
An Australian team found dog-walking was prompting birds to take flight, causing numbers to plummet by 41%.
Oh no, they mean that the birds are dying? I mean, if their numbers drop.....
Dogs were walked, on leads, along the 250m-long (820ft) trails, followed 20 seconds later by an observer who counted the birds seen and heard. The experiment was repeated for walkers without dogs and for a control scenario where there were neither walkers nor dogs. (surely the observer would still interfere with the scenario)

The team found that dog-walking was causing bird numbers to drop by an average of 41% at each site and the numbers of species counted fell by 35%.
So what they're really saying is that, 20 seconds after a dog walks past, 40% of birds have scarpered elsewhere. That's hardly a huge deal, and certainly isn't in line with their opening paragraph..

  • 1
I am very sorry to bother you on your LJ, but I noticed I had been banned from commenting in ask_me_anything. doraemanko said to check with you about it.

Is there a reason I've been banned? I've never been banned anywhere before and so etiquette regarding such is unfamiler to me. I understand you can ban for any reason, and I accept that, but I would like to know if I've done something to be banned, so I can make sure to not do it again.

Thank you for your time,
talonsage

Thank you very much for your prompt attention. :)

I really apprecieate it!!

  • 1
?

Log in

No account? Create an account